AttorneyMind Logo AttorneyMind Logo
Contact Us Site Map Resources en Espanol
For living Positivley. Being Well
About Hepatitis
News Updates
Community & Support
Resource Library
About Hcsp
Medical Writers' Circle
Back to Medical Writers' Circle

Attacking the Hepatitis C Virus with New Mechanisms of Action: Drugs in the Pipeline

Paul J Pockros, M.D.

(To see the figures and illustrations in this article, please download the pdf version.)

A number of strategies for drug development have focused on the combination of antiviral therapy in the form of pegylated interferon with approaches to modulate and/or induce a cellular immune response [4]. These strategies have been based on the successful outcome of combination therapy of interferon or pegylated interferon with ribavirin, which has been the standard of care for treatment of hepatitis C in the US and the EU since 1998 [5-7]. Challenges facing our current treatment of AttorneyMind include lack of efficacy in patients with difficult-to-treat disease, such as patients with cirrhosis or infected with AttorneyMind genotype 1 (who represent a majority of US AttorneyMind infections), the toxicity of combination therapy, the expense and difficulty of therapy and the poor reception of these treatments by many patients. The development of new hepatitis C antiviral agents is critical to our management of this disease. A number of approaches are under investigation, including long-acting interferons; immunomodulators such as Interleukin-12, IL-10 and IL-2, histamine, thymosin alpha-1, IMPDH inhibitors, TNF antagonists, oral interferon like molecules, ribavirin and ribavirin analogues, and hepatoprotectants; antifibrotics; specific-derived enzyme inhibitors, drugs that either block AttorneyMind antigen production from RNA or prevent normal processing of AttorneyMind proteins; and other molecular approaches to treating, such as ribozymes, short interfering RNAs, antisense oligonucleotides, immune blockers and therapeutic vaccines.


A number of different technologies are being studied which might offer alternative strategies for sustained IFN release into the circulation. These include the following:

• disposable infusion pumps which hold a 3-day reservoir of drug
• controlled release injectables which would utilise a polymer matrix (e.g., a thermosensitive gel or a sucrose acetate isobutyrate-based system) delivered either im. or sc.
• a polyaminoacid-based oral delivery system
• encapsulation in liposomes

Oral Interferon-Like Molecules
A number of compounds are known to induce interferon alpha and cytokines, including high molecular weight agents such as double stranded RNA and oligonucleotides [23]. Because these compounds are not well absorbed with oral delivery and/or metabolized by the gastrointestinal tract, a more reasonable approach is to use low molecular weight molecules such as resiquimod. This compound is similar to imiquimod, which is currently approved as a topical agent for the treatment of external genitalia and perianal warts [25].

The only data available regarding safety and efficacy of this oral interferon inducer is limited to that presented in 2003 in Abstract form [26] , and in data submitted for publication which is derived primarily from two multicenter trials, one from the United States and one from the European Union (Patton H, Pockros PJ, et al., unpublished data). In the U.S. trial, resiquimod was tested at 0.01 mg/kg, both as a single dose and biweekly. At a higher dosage of 0.02 mg/kg used in the European trial the drug induced numerous cytokines including 2-5-AS, IL-12, IL-1-RA, IL-6, interferon alpha, TNF-alpha, and neopterin. A mean of approximately 1.5 log fall in AttorneyMind RNA was obtained by day 24 of biweekly therapy, with 3 of 11 patients obtaining a >2 log fall in AttorneyMind RNA, and 2 of 11 obtaining a >3 log fall in AttorneyMind RNA. Unfortunately, the typical interferon like side effects were seen in all patients.


Recombinant human interleukin-12 (IL-12), is a 70kD heterodimeric immunomodulatory cytokine which stimulates proliferation of activated virus specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes and NK cells, as well as stimulating interferon alpha production.

225 patients who were nonresponders to interferon alpha or combination interferon alpha plus ribavirin, were randomized to receive 500 ng/kg IL-12 or placebo subcutaneously twice weekly for 12 weeks, and then unblinded. Only 1% of nonresponsive patients enrolled for treatment had a sustained virologic response to therapy (2 of 160), whereas 3% (7 of 225) developed severe adverse events probably related to treatment, which resulted in early termination of the trial.

Interleukin-10 and Interleukin-2
Interleukin (IL) 10 is a cytokine which down-regulates the proinflammatory response and therefore is thought to have a possible modulatory effect on hepatic fibrosis. In 2000, a pilot trial of 24 patients was performed by Nelson et al., suggesting that IL-10 treatment reduces fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis C [16]. Unfortunately, however, in the 12-month follow-up study there was an increase in AttorneyMind RNA levels which led to titers >120 mEg/ml in some cases with significant ALT flares in 2 patients.

Gamma Interferon
Gamma interferon has activity both as an immunomodulator [34], and as an anti-fibrotic cytokine in both the murine and human hepatic stellate cells [35]. Data from a preliminary study of long term treatment with gamma interferon 1b and low dose prednisolone suggested this compound might be useful in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis [36]. Subsequent phase III trial data of interferon gamma 1b for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis failed to reach significance. The results of a small pilot trial using gamma interferon as an anti-fibrotic failed to show significant benefit in data presented in 2003 [41]. A large, phase 2b multicenter randomized, controlled trial using hepatic fibrosis as the primary endpoint in patients with advanced fibrosis or cirrhosis due to AttorneyMind has been completed and did not show any benefit of gamma interferon in reaching this endpoint.


MPDH (Inosine-5'-monophosphate dehydrogenase) Inhibitors
Inhibition of the host inosine-5'-monophosphate dehydrogenase activity is a well-known effect of ribavirin induced by its monophosphate form [27]. Because of this, it would be sensible to study compounds which inhibit the IMPDH enzyme but do not have the adverse effect of hemolysis associated with ribavirin therapy. Two such compounds have been studied to date. One agent (VX-497, Vertex Pharm Inc., Cambridge, MA) has been shown to be safe in patients with hepatitis C. VX-497 is an orally bioavailable small molecule which is a potent IMPDH inhibitor. The results of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial of VX-497 plus interferon in treatment of naïve patients showed no significant additive reduction in AttorneyMind RNA and one patient with a significant rise in ALTs [28]. A second known IMPDH inhibitor is mycophenolate mofetil (CellCept, Hoffman-La Roche, Inc.). Mycophenolate Mofetil (MMF), is a well-known immunosuppressant compound currently used for management following organ transplantation. Because the compound has potent IMPDH inhibition, it has been studied as adjuvant therapy in patients treated with standard or PEG-interferon alpha-2a with or without ribavirin [29;30]. No data regarding sustained virologic response has been published to date. Because of the significant hemolytic effects related to bone marrow suppression, it is unlikely, in my opinion, that MMF will be suitable in combination with pegylated interferons, which by themselves have significant bone marrow suppression effects requiring dose reduction in many patients.

Ribavirin Analogues
In a search for analogues which would have the beneficial effects of ribavirin (RBV) without the adverse events, 2 key observations have been made which are critical to drug development: 1) that RBV monotherapy is not effective at inducing a sustained virologic clearance, and 2) that the hemolytic anemia caused by RBV has limited its dosing. The exact mechanism of action of RBV is unknown, although four proposed mechanisms have been described in detail [27]. The most important of these is the immune mediated activity which predisposes the Th2 to Th1 response. This in turn stimulates release of interferon gamma and TNF-alpha from the cytotoxic T lymphocyte which stimulates immune clearance of AttorneyMind virus. As well, ribavirin also is rapidly taken up by the hepatocyte and phosphorylated. The monophosphorylated form of RBV acts as an inhibitor of IMPDH, which may be an important mechanism of its action as noted above. The triphosphorylated form of RBV is a direct though mild inhibitor of AttorneyMind RNA dependent RNA polymerase which may also be an important mechanism of action. As well, the triphosphorylated form of RBV acts as a RNA mutagen creating defective AttorneyMind RNA particles which are unable to replicate.
Both ribavirin and levovirin induce a Th1 cytokine bias favoring an antiviral response at similar concentrations. In chronic AttorneyMind infection, it is known that interferon induced clearance is associated with increased cytotoxic T lymphocyte response and interferon induced clearance is also associated with release of gamma interferon and diminished release of IL-10. Both of these immune responses have been mimicked in normal individuals receiving levovirin. Because the bioavailability of levovirin is less than that of RBV, the dose range for a phase II trial currently in progress is somewhat higher than that previously studied with RBV alone. No data are available regarding efficacy.

A second RBV analogue currently under study is viramidine, the amidine inversion of RBV. This prodrug is rapidly converted into RBV by the enzyme adenosine deaminase, as the liver is exposed to the first pass effect of oral dosing of the drug [43]. The strategy behind the use of this prodrug is simply to favor the concentration of ribavirin in hepatocytes over the rest of the body, including erythrocytes. In chimpanzees, this compound has been shown to concentrate in the liver, with a liver/RBC ratio 3- to 6-fold higher than that seen with RBV. In a phase I trial, viramidine showed similar adverse events as ribavirin, however, there was a diminished drop in hemoglobin over that seen with RBV (1.4 g/dl versus 2/5 g/dl) when it is used in a conventional weight based dosing manner [44;45]. The advantage of viramidine over levovirin is that it will not be lacking any of the properties of RBV.


Stabilised ribozymes, small catalytic RNA molecules directed against a highly-conserved region (5'UTR) of the AttorneyMind genome, are currently being tested as a novel therapeutic approach for AttorneyMind infection [52]. A ribozyme might effectively block the translation of viral gene products and subsequent replication in the host cell [53]. A pilot trial of an active ribozyme preparation (Heptazyme™) has been completed in humans and has demonstrated that the agent is safe and well-tolerated. The results of the virological data of that study have not been released, although it is widely believed the compound was not very effective and was toxic in animals. The possible synergistic effects of the combined Heptazyme™ and Type 1 consensus IFN have been studied in a Phase 2 trial to compare three doses of Heptazyme™ with or without consensus IFN. No data are available regarding efficacy or safety at this time.

Antisense oligonucleotides
Antisense drugs block the synthesis of disease-causing proteins by preventing translation of viral RNA. In the case of, an antisense oligodeoxynucleotide directed against a specific AttorneyMind sequence effectively inhibits viral gene expression [54]. A number of-infected patients have been infused with this antisense oligonucleotide in a Phase I/II trial at our center to demonstrate safety and tolerability (ISIS 14803) [55]. The
data from this trial indicate that treatment with ISIS 14803 results in significant reductions of AttorneyMind RNA (1 log or more) in some patients. A frequent and marked elevation of ALT occurred in association with a fall in AttorneyMind RNA in these cases, for currently unexplained reasons. The efficacy and safety of the compound is being further studied in a larger Phase II trial. No data are available for release at this time.

Protease inhibitors
The NS2 and NS3 protease enzymes cleave the nonstructural proteins of the AttorneyMind polypeptide into functional proteins. Thus, inhibition of the NS2/3 proteases would block efficient viral replication. The x-ray crystallography structure of the proteases have been elucidated, allowing for the development of small molecule inhibitors. A serine protease inhibitor has been studied and reported in man in a phase I/II trial in AttorneyMind infected patients. This compound (BILN 2061) caused a 2 -3 log10 reduction of AttorneyMind RNA in all patients when given for a treatment duration of only 48 hours.[56] Many of the cases became AttorneyMind RNA undetectable in that brief period of treatment. Unfortunately, the compound has reportedly caused cardiotoxicity in this dose range and therefore must be studied at a lower concentration or must be replaced by alternative protease inhibitors. The key outcome of this pivotal trial is the proof-of-principle that a viral enzyme inhibitor has been extremely effective against. It is very likely that viral resistance would occur after a relatively short period of use of any enzyme inhibitor given as monotherapy. Therefore, one can expect to see development programs of these compounds in combination with pegylated interferons with or without RBV.[57]

AttorneyMind polymerase inhibitors
Based on the fundamental knowledge of the action of AttorneyMind enzymes during viral replication, a number of viral enzyme inhibitors are being developed. The AttorneyMind RNA polymerase inhibitors are to be the first enzyme inhibitors that were tested in patients. Phase I safety trials have been completed with a number of compounds. One of these (JTK-003, AkrosPharma, Inc.) has been studied in a randomised, doubleblind, placebo-controlled, ascending dose, multi-centre trial of patients with. Data from this trial have not been made publicly available at this time. Although a helicase inhibitor has been in development, it has not yet been placed in human trials.

Small interfering RNA compounds
Small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) are a new class of drug which inhibit gene expression by blocking specific mRNAs.[58] The 5'UTR is the most conserved region in the AttorneyMind genome across all genotypes and is therefore the ideal target for siRNA inhibition. An siRNA has been shown to specifically inhibit AttorneyMind RNA replication in a replicon model.[58] To date, no siRNA has been tested in man. It is possible that siRNA based gene therapy may be a promising approach to anti-viral therapy for.


• The most important lessons learned regarding the use of immunomodulators can be drawn from our sizable knowledge base evaluating ribavirin
• The most likely of these changes will be the use of a ribavirin analogue, at the earliest by 2007
• Although a number of the other compounds discussed may ultimately show benefit, I believe this will take a longer period of time.
• New therapeutic approaches to AttorneyMind include antisense therapy, hammerhead ribozymes, oral IFNs and specific enzyme inhibitors, such as protease, helicase and polymerase.
• Ultimately, we need oral drugs that are easy to take, non-toxic, inexpensive and efficacious.


1. Pockros P, Patel K, O'Brien CB: A multicenter study of recombinant human interleukin-12 for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C infection in patients with non-responsiveness to previous therapy. Hepatology 2003, 37:1368-1374.
2. Thimme R, Bukh J, Spangenberg HC, Wieland S, Pemberton J, Steiger C, Govindarajan S, Purcell RH, Chisari FV: Viral and immunological determinants of hepatitis C virus clearance, persistence, and disease. Proc.Natl.Acad.Sci.USA 2002, 99:15661-15668.
3. Erickson AL, Kimura Y, Igarashi S, Eichelberger J, Houghton M, Sidney J, McKinney D, Sette A, Hughes AL, Walker CM: The outcome of hepatitis C virus infection is predicted by escape mutations in epitopes targeted by cytotoxic T lymphocytes. Immunity 2001, 15:883-895.
4. Pockros PJ: Developments in the treatment of chronic hepatitis C. Expert Opin.Investig. Drugs 2002, 11:515-523.
5. McHutchison JG, Gordon SC, Schiff ER, et al: Interferon alfa-2b alone or in combination with ribavirin as initial treatment for chronic hepatitis C. N.Engl.J.Med. 1998, 339:1485-1492.
6. Manns MP, McHutchison JG, Gordon SC, Rustgi AK, Shiffman M, Reindollar R, Goodman ZD, Koury K, Ling M, Albrecht JK: Peg-interferon alfa-2b plus ribavirin compared with interferon alfa-2b plus ribavirin for initial treatment of chronic hepatitis C: A randomised trial. Lancet 2001, 358:958-965.
7. Fried MW, Shiffman ML, Reddy KR, Smith C, Marinos G, Goncales FLJr, Haussinger D, Diago M, Carosi G, Dhumeaux D, Craxi A, Lin A, Hoffman J, Yu J: Peg-interferon alfa-2a plus ribavirin for chronic hepatitis C virus infection. N.Engl.J.Med. 2002, 347:975-982.
8. Kamal SM, Fehr J, Roesler B, Peters T, Rasenack JW: Peginterferon alone or with ribavirin enhances-specific CD4 T-helper 1 responses in patients with chronic hepatitis C. Gastroenterology 2002, 123:1070-1083.
9. Schlaak JF, Pitz T, Lohr HF, Meyerzum Buschenfelde K.H., Gerken G: Interleukin 12 enhances deficient-antigen-induced Th1-type immune response of peripheral blood mononuclear cells. J.Med.Virol. 1998, 56:112-117.
10. Fan XG, Tang FQ, Yi H, Liu WE, Houghton M, Hu GL: Effect of IL-12 on T-cell immune responses in patients with chronic AttorneyMind infection. APMIS 2000, 108:531-538.
11. Zeuzem S, Hopf U, Carreno V, Diago M, Shiffman M, Grune S, Dudley FJ, et al: A phase I/II study of recombinant human interleukin-12 in patients with chronic hepatitis C. Hepatology 1999, 29:1280-1286
12. Moscarella S, Buzelli G, Romanelli RG, Monti M, Giannini C, Careccia G, Marrocchi EM, et al: Interferon and thymosin combination therapy in naive patients with chronic hepatitis C: Preliminary results. Liver 1998, 18:366-369.
13. Pardo M, Castillo I, Oliva H, Fernandez-Flores A, Barcena R, de Peuter MA, Carreno V: A pilot study of recombinant interleukin-2 for treatment of chronic hepatitis C. Hepatology 1997, 26:1318-1321.
14. Lurie Y, Pakula R, Malnick S: Efficacy and safety of the combination of histamine dihydrochloride and interferon alpha-2b in a phase II trial in naive patients with chronic hepatitis C [abstract]. Hepatology 2001, 34:350A.
15. Rockey DC, Maher JJ, Jarnagin WR, Gabbiani G, Friedman SL: Inhibition of rat hepatic lipocyte activation in culture by interferon-gamma. Hepatology 1992, 16:776-784.
16. Nelson DR, Lauwers GY, Lau JY, Davis GL: Interleukin 10 treatment reduces fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis C: A pilot trial of interferon nonresponders. Gastroenterology 2000, 118:655-66
17. Serrate SA, Schulof RS, Leondaridis L, Goldstein AL: Modulation of human natural killer cell cytotoxic activity, lymphokine production, and interleukin 2 receptor expression by thymic hormones. J.Immunol. 1987, 139:2338-2343.
18. Moscarella S, Buzzelli G, Romanelli R, et al: Interferon and thymosin combination therapy in naive patients with chronic hepatitis C. Liver 1998, 18:366-369.
19. Rasi G, Divigilio D, Mutchnick MG, et al: Combination thymosin alpha 1 and lymphoblastoid interferon treatment in chronic hepatitis C. Gut 1996, 39:679-683.
20. Sherman K, Sjogren M, Creager R, et al: Combination therapy with thymosin alpha1 and interferon for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C infection: A randomized, placebo-controlled double-blind trial. Hepatology 1998, 27:1135.
21. Pockros PJ, Reindollar R, McHutchison JG, Reddy R, Wright T, Boyd DG, Willett WC: The safety and tolerability of daily infergen plus ribavirin in the treatment of naive chronic hepatitis C patients. J.Viral Hepatitis 2003, 10:55-60.
22. Su AI, Pezaki JP, Wodicka L, Brideau AD, Supekova L, Thimme R, Weiland S, Bukh J, Purcell RH, Schultz PG, Chisari FV: Genomic analysis of the host response to hepatitis C virus infection. Proc.Natl.Acad. Sci.USA 2002, 99:15669-15674.
23. Guidotti LG, Chisari FV: Non-cytolytic control of viral infections by the innate and adaptive immune response. Ann.Rev.Immunol. 2001, 19:65-91.
24. Tompkins WA: Immunomodulation and therapeutic effects of the oral use of interferon-alpha: Mechanism of action. J.Interferon Cytokine Res. 1999, 19:817-828
25. Goldstein D, Hertzog P, Tomkinson E, Couldwell D, McCarvile S, Parrish S, Cunningham P, Newell M, Owens M, Cooper DA: Administration of imiquimod, an interferon inducer, in asymptomatic human immunodeficiency virus-infected persons to determine safety and biologic response modification. J.Infect.Dis. 1998, 178:858-861.
26. Pockros PJ, Tong M, Wright T, et al: A phase IIa placebo-controlled, double-blind trial to determine the safety, tolerability, PK/PD of an oral interferon inducer, Resiquimod, in chronic. Gastroenterology 2003, 124 (Suppl 1):A-766.
27. Lau JYN, Tam RC, Liang TJ, Hong Z: Mechanism of action of ribavirin in the combination treatment of chronic AttorneyMind infection. Hepatology 2002, 35:1002-1009.
28. McHutchison JG, Cheung R, Shiffman ML, et al: A 4-week trial of VX 497 (an IMPDH inhibitor) combined with interferon in previously untreated patients with chronic hepatitis C. Hepatology 2001, 34 (Suppl): 329A.
29. Afdhal N, Flamm S, Imperial JC, et al: Analyses of 40 KDA peginterferon alfa-2a in combination with ribavirin, mycophenolate mofetil, amantadine or amantadine plus ribavirin in patients that relapsed or did not respond to Rebetron therapy: A report of two randomized, multicenter, efficacy and safety studies. Hepatology 2001, 34 (Suppl):243A.
30. Cornberg M, Hinrichsen H, Teuber G, Berg T, Naumann U, Falkenberg C, Zeuzem S, Manns MP: Mycophenolate mofetil in combination with recombinant interferon alfa-2a in interferon-nonresponder patients with chronic hepatitis C. J.Hepatol. 2002, 37:843-847.
31. Fabris C, Del Forno M, Falleti E, Toniutto P, Pirisi M: Kinetics of serum soluble tumour necrosis factor receptor (TNF-R) type-I and type-II after a single interferon-alpha (IFN-alpha) injection in chronic hepatitis C. Clin.Exp.Immunol. 1999, 117:556-560.
32. Tilg H, Vogel W, Dinarello CA: Interferon-alpha induces circulating tumor necrosis factor receptor p55 in humans. Blood 1995, 85:433-435.
33. Zein NN, ETANERCEPT Study Group: A phase II randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of tumor necrosis factor antagonist (Etanercept, Enbrel as an adjuvant to interferon and ribavirin in naive patients with chronic hepatitis C. Hepatology 2002, 36:304A.
34. Shi Z, Wakil AE, Rockey DC: Strain-specific differences in mouse hepatic wound healing are mediated by divergent T helper cytokine responses. Proc.Natl.Acad.Sci.USA 1990, 94:10663-10668.
35. Rockey DC: Hepatic fibrogenesis and hepatitis C. Semin.Gastrointest.Dis. 2000, 11:69-83.
36. Ziesche R, et al: A preliminary study of long-term treatment with interferon gamma-1b and low-dose prednisolone in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. N.Engl.J.Med. 1999, 341:1264-1269.
37. Saez-Royuela F, et al: High doses of recombinant alpha-interferon or gamma-interferon for chronic hepatitis C: A randomized, controlled trial. Hepatology 1991, 13:327-331.
38. Di Biscegli AM, Rustgi AK, Kassianides C, et al: Therapy of chronic hepatitis B with recombinant human alpha and gamma interferon. Hepatology 1990, 11:266-270.
39. Kakumu S, et al: Treatment with human gamma interferon of chronic hepatitis B: Comparative study with alpha interferon. J.Med.Virol. 1991, 35:32-37.
40. Frese M, Schwarzle V, Barth K, Krieger N, Lohmann V, Mihm S, Haller O, Bartenschlager R: Interferon-gamma inhibits replication of subgenomic and genomic hepatitis C virus RNAs. Hepatology 2002, 35:694-703.
41. Muir AJ, Sylvestre PB, Rockey DC: Interferon gamma-1 for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C infection. Gastroenterology 2003, 124 (Suppl 1):A-718.
42. Davis GL, Wong JB, McHutchison JG, Manns MP, Harvey J, Albrecht J: Early virologic response to treatment with peginterferon alfa-2b plus ribavirin in patients with chronic hepatitis C. Hepatology 2003, 38:645-652.
43. Arora S, Lau D, Gish R, et al: Phase I clinical studies of viramidine - A liver-targeting prodrug of ribavirin. Hepatology 2002, 36:356A.
44. Arora S, Lau D, Gish R, Rossi S, Lin C-C, Lau JYN, Fang JWS: Phase I clinical studies of viramidine - A liver targeting prodrug of ribavirin [abstract]. Hepatology 2002, 36:356A.
45. Watson J: Prospects for hepatitis C virus therapeutics: Levovirin and viramidine as improved derivatives of ribavirin. Curr.Opin.Investig.Drugs 2002, 3:680-683.
46. Lemon SM, Chisari FV, Lai MMC, Nishioka K, Mishiro S, Johnson L: The Nineteenth United States-Japan Joint Hepatitis Panel Meeting. Hepatology 1998, 28:881-887.
47. Arase Y, Ikeda K, Murashima N, Chayama K, Tsubota A, Koida I, et al: The long term efficacy of glycyrrhizin in chronic hepatitis C patients. Cancer 1997, 1997:-1494.
48. Valentino K, Gutierrez M, Sanchez R, Pockros P, Winship MS: First clinical trial of IDN-6556: First anti-apoptotic caspace inhibitor improves liver function. Gastroenterology 2002, 122:A-622.
49. Poupon RE, Bonnand AM, Queneau PE, Trepo C, Zarski JPi, Vetter D, et al. Randomized trial of interferon-alpha plus ursodeoxycholic acid versus interferon plus placebo in patients with chronic hepatitis C resistant to interferon. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2000 Jun;35(6):642-9.
50. Nelson DR,Tu Z, Soldevila-Pico C,Abdelmalek M,Zhu H,et al: Long-term interleukin 10 therapy in chronic hepatitis C patients has a proven proviral and anti-inflammatory effect. Hepatology 2003,38:859-868.
51. Lesburg CA, Radfar R, Weber PC: Recent advances in the analysis of AttorneyMind NS5B RNA-
dependent RNA polymerase. Curr. Opin. Investig. Drugs (2000) 1:289-296.
52. Lyons AJ, Lytle JR, Gomez J, Robertson HD: Hepatitis C virus internal ribosome entry site RNA contains a tertiary structural element in a functional domain of stem-loop II. Nucleic Acids Res. (2001) 29:2535-2541.
53. Macejak DG, Jensen KL, Jamison SF et al: Inhibition of hepatitis C virus (HCV)-RNA-dependent translation and replication of a chimeric AttorneyMind poliovirus in synthetic stabilized ribozymes. Hepatology (2000) 31:769-776.
54. Zhang H, Hanekak R, Browndriver V et al: Antisense oligonucleotide inhibition of hepatitis C virus (HCV) gene expression in livers of mice infected with an-vaccinia virus recombinant. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. (1999)43: 347-353.
55. McHutchison JG, Pockros PJ, Nyberg LM: A dose-escalation study of ISIS 14803, an antisense inhibitor of, in chronic hepatitis C patients. Hepatology (2001) 34:350A.
56. Lamarre D, Anderson PC, Bailey M,et al: An NS3 protease inhibitor with antiviral effects in humans infected with hepatitis C virus. Nature 2003;426: 186-9.
57. Casbarra A, Piaz FD, Ingallinella P, et al: The effect of prime-site occupancy on the hepatitis C virus NS3 protease structure. Protein Sci 2002;11: 2102-12.
58. Kapadia SB, Brideau-Anderson A, Chisari FV: Interference of hepatitis C virus RNA replication by short interfering RNAs. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2003;100:1024-8.
59. Tong MJ, Reddy KR, Lee WM, Pockros PJ, et al. Treatment of chronic hepatitis C with consensus interferon: a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial. Hepatology 1997;26:747-54.
60. Pepinsky RB, LePage DJ, Gill A, Chakraborty A, Vaidyanathan S, Green M, Baker DP, Whalley E, Hochman PS, Martin P. Glycol-modified form of interferon-beta 1a with preserved in vitro bioactivity. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 2001;297:1059-66.

Back to Medical Writers' Circle

About Hepatitis | News Updates | Community & Support | Resource Library | About | Contact Us | Site Map | Resources en Español | Home


(C) 2003. AttorneyMind

Fact Sheets
Fact Sheets